Color Code:
Journal Paper (SCI),
Journal Paper (Other),
Book Chapter,
Conference Paper,
Technical Report
A. SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
A1. SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
Software Architecture
M.Ö.Demir, O.Chouseinoglou, and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2024). "Factors affecting architectural
decision-making process and challenges in software projects: An industrial survey", Journal
of Software: Evolution and Process (
link).
M.Söylemez, B.Tekinerdoğan, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2024). "Microservice Reference Architecture
Design: A Multi‐case Study", Journal of Software: Practice and Experience, 54: 58–84
(
link).
M.Söylemez, B.Tekinerdoğan, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "Challenges and Solution Directions
of Microservice Architectures: A Systematic Literature Review", Applied Sciences, 12 (11),
5507 (
link).
M.Söylemez, B.Tekinerdoğan, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "Feature-Driven Characterization of
Microservice Architectures: A Survey Study of the State-of-the-Practice", Applied Sciences
(Special Issue
Software Engineering: Computer Science and System), 12 (9): 1-20, 4424
(
link).
AI-enabled Software Development
T.G.Erdogan, H.Altunel, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2024). "A process model for AI-enabled software
development: a synthesis from validation studies in white literature", Journal of Software:
Evolution and Process. (
link)
T.G.Erdogan, H.Altunel, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "Tools/frameworks that support development
process of AI-based software: validations in white literature", in proceedings of the 31st
International Workshop on Software Measurement (IWSM) and the 16th International Conference on
Software Process and Product Measurement (MENSURA), CEUR Proceedings,
(
link).
Data-driven Software Development
Yalçıner, A., Dikici, A., & Gökalp, E. (2024). Data-Driven Software Engineering: A Systematic
Literature Review. In European Conference on Software Process Improvement (pp. 19-32). Springer,
Cham. (
link)
Agile Software Development
N. Ozkan, T.G. Erdogan, S. Bal & M. Ş. Gök (2023). A bibliometric analysis of Agile software
development publications originating from Turkey. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 36(5),
e2601.
(
link)
N. Ozkan, T.G. Erdogan, S. Bal & M. Ş. Gök (2022) ”Scrum, Kanban or a Mix of Both? A Systematic
Literature Review”. The 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS)
(Joint 42th IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW-42) and 9th International Workshop on
Cyber-Physical Systems (IWCPS-9))
(
link)
N.Ozkan, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan, İ.Filiz, E.Özer, and B.Gören. (2020). "Harmonizing IT Frameworks and
Agile Methods: Challenges and Solutions for the case of COBIT and Scrum", in proceedings of the
4th International Conference on Lean and Agile Software Development (LASD), IEEE CPS
(
link).
N.Ozkan and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2020). "Evaluation of Scrum-based Agile Scaling Models for
Causes of Scalability Challenges", in proceedings of Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software
Engineering (ENASE), pp. 365-272. (
link)
N.Ozkan and A.Tarhan. (2019). "A Review of Scaling Approaches to Agile Software Development
Models", Software Quality Professional.
(
link)
N.Ozkan and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2019). "Investigating Challenges of Scalability in Agile Software
Development from a Design Perspective", in proceedings of The 36th National Informatics Congress
and The 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (UBMYK), IEEE CPS
(
link).
N.Ozkan ve A.Tarhan. (2018). "An Investigation into Increased Agility by Balancing Agile and
Traditional Process Approaches (Çevikliği Arttırmak İçin Çevik ve Geleneksel Süreç Yaklaşımlarını
Dengelemeye Yönelik Bir İnceleme)", XII. Ulusal Yazılım Mühendisliği Sempozyumu, İstanbul (in CEUR
Proceedings, Vol. 2201) (
link).
N.Ozkan, A.Tarhan, and C.Kucuk. (2017). "SCRUM at Scale in a COBIT Compliant Environment: The
Case of Turkiye Finans IT", Industry & Practice, XP Conference, Cologne, Germany.
(
link)
A.Tarhan and S.G.Yilmaz. (2014). "Systematic Analyses and Comparison of the Development Performance
and Product Quality of Incremental Process and Agile Process", Information & Software Technology,
56(5): 477-494. (
link)
Software Test Process
Özkurt, A., Gökalp, E., & Ipek, A. H. (2024). A Software Test Maturity Model Customized for
Aerospace Industries: A Systematic Literature Review. In European Conference on Software Process
Improvement (pp. 374-389). Springer, Cham. (
link)
G.Güngör, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2023). "A Maturity Model Guidance Approach for Integration Testing
of Avionics Software", 32nd International Workshop on Software Measurement (IWSM) and the 17th
International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (MENSURA), Rome, Italy
(CEUR Proceedings, Vol. 3543) (
link).
A2. SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
Software Acquisition
A.Tarhan, Ç.Gencel, and O.Demirörs. (2007). “Pre-Contract Challenges: Two Large System Acquisition
Experiences”, Chapter 4, pp.51-73,
Enterprise Architecture and Integration, (ISBN: 978-1-59140-887-1), IGI Global, Information
Science Reference, Hershey-NY.
O.Demirörs, Ç.Gencel, and A.Tarhan. (2006). “Challenges of Acquisition Planning - Two Large
System Acquisition Experiences”, in Proceedings of Euromicro Conference, pp. 256-263.
(
link)
O.Demirörs, E.Demirörs, and A.Tarhan. (2001). “Managing Instructional Software Acquisition”,
Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol 6, Issue 4, pp. 189-203.
(
link)
O.Demirörs, E.Demirörs, A.Tarhan, and A.Yıldız. (2000). “Tailoring ISO/IEC 12207 for Instructional
Software Development”, in Proceedings of the 26th Euromicro Conference-Volume 2, pp. 300-307.
(
link)
Software Project Management
Gökay, G. T., Nazlıel, K., Şener, U., Gökalp, E., Gökalp, M. O., Gençal, N., ... & Eren, P. E.
(2022). What drives success in data science projects: A taxonomy of antecedents. In International
Conference on Computing, Intelligence and Data Analytics (pp. 448-462). Cham: Springer
International Publishing.
(
link)
D.D.Erhan, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan, and R.Özakıncı. (2020). "Selecting Suitable Software Effort Estimation
Method", in proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Software Measurement (IWSM) and the
15th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (MENSURA) (CEUR
Proceedings, Vol. 2725) (
link).
V.Garousi, A.Tarhan, D.Pfahl, A.Coskuncay and O.Demirors. (2019). "Correlation of Critical Success
Factors with Success of Software Projects: An Empirical Investigation", Software Quality Journal,
Vol 27, Issue 1, pp: 429-493 (
link).
M.Erhan, A.Tarhan, and A.Ozsoy. (2019). "A Conceptual Model for Blockchain-Based Software Project
Information Sharing", in proceedings of The 29th International Workshop on Software Measurement
(IWSM) and the 14th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement
(MENSURA), IWSM-Mensura, (CEUR Proceedings, Vol-2476) (
link)
V.Garousi and A.Tarhan. (2018). "Investigating the Impact of Team Formation by Introversion/Extraversion
in Software Projects", Balkan Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering (BAJECE), Vol 6, No 2,
pp. 64-72. (
link)
A.Tarhan, O.Demirörs, and E.Demirörs. (1999). “A Distributed Tool for Commitment Specification
and Management”, in Proceedings of the 25th Euromicro Conference - Volume 2, pp. 210-217.
(
link)
Functional Size Measurement Automation
A.Tarhan and M.A.Sağ. (2018). "COSMIC Solver: A Tool for Functional Sizing of Java Business
Applications", Balkan Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering (BAJECE), Vol.6, No.1.
(
link)
A.Tarhan, B.Ozkan, and G.C.Icoz. (2016). "A Proposal on Requirements for COSMIC FSM Automation
from Source Code", in proceedings of IWSM-Mensura, IEEE CPS, pp. 195-200
(
link).
M.A.Sag and A.Tarhan. (2014). "Measuring COSMIC Software Size from Functional Execution Traces of
Java Business Applications", in proceedings of IWSM-Mensura, pp. 272-281, IEEE CPS
(
link).
R.Gönültaş and A.Tarhan. (2015). "Run-time Calculation of COSMIC Functional Size via Automatic
Installment of Measurement Code into Java Business Applications", in proceedings of The 41th
Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 112-118,
IEEE CPS (
link).
A.A.Akca and A.Tarhan. (2013). "Run-time measurement of COSMIC functional size for Java business
applications: Is it worth the cost?", in proceedings of IWSM-Mensura, pp. 54-59, IEEE CPS
(
link).
A.A.Akca and A.Tarhan. (2012) "Run-time Measurement of COSMIC Functional size for Java Business
Applications: Intial Results", in proceedings of IWSM-Mensura 2012, pp. 226-231, IEEE CPS
(
link).
A3. SOFTWARE PROCESS QUALITY
Software Process Assessment
Gökalp, E., Çalişkanbaş, B., & Koçyiğit, A. (2024). A reference model for software product line
capability assessment. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 36(4), e2567.
(
link)
D.Savaş, E.Gokalp, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2021). "Capability Assessment of Software Product Line
Processes in Defense Industry", in proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Computer
Science and Engineering (UBMK), IEEE CPS
(
link).
A.Tarhan and G.Giray. (2017). "On the Use of Ontologies in Software Process Assessment: A
Systematic Literature Review", in proceedings of Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
(EASE), ACM, pp. 2-11. (
link)
S.Gazel, E.A.Sezer, and A.Tarhan. (2012). “An Ontology Based Infrastructure To Support CMMI-Based
Software Process Assessment”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol 25, no 1, sf.155-164.
(
link)
A.Tarhan and O.Demirörs. (2011). “Investigating the Effect of Variations in Test Development
Process: A Case from a Safety-Critical System”, Software Quality Journal, cilt 19, sayı 4, sf.
615-642. (
link)
Software Process Improvement
S. Taskesenli, N. Ozkan, T.G. Erdogan (2022) Identifying Possible Improvements of Software
Development Lifecycle Process of a Bank by Using Process Mining, International Journal of
Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1–28, DOI: 10.1142/S0218194022400010.
(
link)
M.Söylemez and A.Tarhan. (2018). "Challenges of Software Process and Product Quality Improvement:
Catalyzing Defect Root-Cause Investigation by Process Enactment Data Analysis", Software Quality
Journal, 26 (2), 779-807.
(
read-only)
(
link)
M.Soylemez and A.Tarhan. (2013). "Using Process Enactment Data Analysis to Support Orthogonal Defect
Classification for Software Process Improvement", in proceedings of IWSM-Mensura 2013, pp. 120-125,
IEEE CPS. (
link)
A.Tarhan and O.Demirörs. (2012). “Apply Quantitative Management Now”, IEEE Software, Vol.29,
Issue: 3, pp.77-85.
(
link)
A.Tarhan and O.Demirörs. (2011). “Investigating the Effect of Variations in Test Development
Process: A Case from a Safety-Critical System”, Software Quality Journal, cilt 19, sayı 4, sf.
615-642. (
link)
A.Tarhan and O.Demirörs. (2011). “Assessment of Software Process and Metrics to Support Quantitative
Understanding: Experience from an Undefined Task Management Process”, Springer CCIS (Communications
in Computer and Information Science), vol. 155, part. 4, pp. 108-120.
(
link)
A.Tarhan and O.Demirörs. (2008). “Assessment of Software Process and Metrics to Support Quantitative
Understanding”, Software Process and Product Measurement, Springer LNCS (Lecture Notes in Computer
Science), vol. 4895, pp. 102-113.
(
link)
S.Kırbaş, A.Tarhan, and O.Demirörs. (2007). "An Assessment and Analysis Tool for Statistical
Process Control of Software Processes", in Proceedings of The 7th International SPICE Conference.
(
link)
A.Tarhan and O.Demirörs. (2006). “Investigating Suitability of Software Process and Metrics for
Statistical Process Control”, Software Process Improvement, pp. 88-99, Springer LNCS (Lecture
Notes in Computer Science), vol. 4257.
(
link)
A4. SOFTWARE PRODUCT QUALITY
Generic
N.Yilmaz and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2020). "Meta-models for Software Quality and Its Evaluation:
A Systematic Literature Review", in proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Software
Measurement (IWSM) and the 15th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement
(MENSURA). (CEUR Proceedings, Vol. 2725)
(
link).
AI-enabled Product Quality
B.Gezici and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2025). "Explainable AI Framework For Software Defect Prediction",
Journal of Software: Evolution and Process
(
link).
M. Canpolat Şahin, and A. Kolukısa-Tarhan (2025), "Evaluation and Selection of Hardware and AI
Models for Edge Applications: A Method and A Case Study on UAVs", Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1026
(
link).
M.Ö. Demir, B. Gezici and A. Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2023). "Assessing The Explainability of Lgbm Model
For Effort Estimation on ISBSG Dataset," 4th International Informatics and Software Engineering
Conference (IISEC), Ankara, pp. 1-6
(
link).
B.Gezici and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "Systematic Literature Review on Software Quality for
AI-based Software", Emprical Software Engineering, 27 (66), 2022
(
link).
B.Gezici, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "Explainable AI for Software Defect Prediction with Gradient
Boosting classifier", in proceedings of The 7th International Conference on Computer Science and
Engineering (UBMK), IEEE CPS
(
link).
Open Source Software Quality
N.Yılmaz and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2024). "Quality Evaluation Meta-model for Open Source Software:
Multi-method Validation Study", Software Quality Journal, 32: 487-541
(
link).
N.Yilmaz and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2023). "Matching Terms of Quality Models and Meta-models:
Towards a Unified Meta-model of OSS Quality", Software Quality Journal, 31: 721-773
(
link).
N.Yılmaz and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "Quality Evaluation Models or Frameworks for Open Source
Software: A Systematic Literature Review", Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 34 (6),
e2458.
(
link).
B.Gezici, A.Tarhan and O.Chouseinoglou. (2019). "Internal and External Quality in the Evoluton
of Mobile Software: An Exploratory Study in Open-Source Market", Information and Software
Technology, Issue 112, pp. 178-200
(
link).
B.Gezici, A.Tarhan and O.Chouseinoglou. (2019). "Complexity, Size and Internal Quality in the
Evolution of Mobile Applications: An Exploratory Study" (in Turkish), Journal of the Faculty of
Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, Vol. 34, Issue 3, pp. 1483-1500
(
link).
N.Yılmaz and A.Tarhan. (2019). "A Two-dimensional Method for Evaluating Maintainability and
Reliability of Open Source Software " (in Turkish), Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and
Architecture of Gazi University, Vol.34, Issue 4, pp. 1807-1829
(
link).
B.Gezici, N.Ozdemir, N.Yilmaz, E.Coskun, A.Tarhan, and O.Chouseinoglou. (2019). "Quality and
Success in Open Source Software: A Systematic Mapping", in proceedings of The 45th Euromicro
Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), IEEE CPS
(
link).
B.Gezici, N.Bölücü, A.Tarhan, and B.C.Buğlalılar. (2019). "Neural Sentiment Analysis of User
Reviews to Predict User Ratings", in proceedings of The 4th International Conference on Computer
Science and Engineering (UBMK), IEEE CPS
(
link).
E.Hanoğlu and A.Tarhan. (2019). "An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Open Source Software
Success and Test Effort", in proceedings of The 4th International Conference on Computer Science
and Engineering (UBMK), IEEE CPS
(
link).
U.Yilmaz and A.Tarhan. (2018). "A Case Study to Compare Regression Test Selection Techniques on
Open-Source Software Projects (Açık Kaynak Kodlu Yazılım Projelerinde Regresyon Test Seçim
Tekniklerinin Karşılaştırılması için Bir Vaka Çalışması)", Yazılım Test Mühendisliği Alt Alanı,
XII. Ulusal Yazılım Mühendisliği Sempozyumu, İstanbul (in CEUR Proceedings, Vol. 2201)
(
link).
Cloud EIS Quality
Şener, U., Gökalp, E., & Eren, P. E. (2024). CLOUD-QM: a quality model for benchmarking cloud-based
enterprise information systems. Software Quality Journal, 32(3), 881-920.
(
link)
Embedded Software Quality
M. Canpolat Şahin, and A. Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2025). A Multi‐Perspective Review on Embedded Systems
Quality: State of the Field, Challenges, and Research Directions, Journal of Software: Evolution
and Process 37 (3), e70007
(
link).
Software Defect Prediction
B.Gezici and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2025). "Explainable AI Framework For Software Defect Prediction",
Journal of Software: Evolution and Process
(
link).
R.Ozakinci, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2023). "A Decision Analysis Approach for Selecting Software Defect
Prediction Method in the Early Phases", Software Quality Journal, 31: 121-177
(
link).
B.Gezici, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "Explainable AI for Software Defect Prediction with Gradient
Boosting classifier", in proceedings of The 7th International Conference on Computer Science and
Engineering (UBMK), IEEE CPS
(
link).
R.Özakıncı and A.Tarhan. (2019). "An Evaluation Approach for Selecting Suitable Defect Prediction
Method at Early Phases", in proceedings of The 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering
and Advanced Applications (SEAA), IEEE CPS
(
link).
R.Özakıncı and A.Tarhan. (2018). "Early Software Defect Prediction: A Systematic Map and Review",
Journal of Systems and Software, 144: 216-239.
(
link)
R.Özakıncı and A.Tarhan. (2016). "The Role of Process in Early Software Defect Prediction: Methods,
Attributes, and Metrics", in proceedings of The 16th International SPICE Conference, Springer CCIS
(Communications in Computer and Information Science), vol. 609, pp. 287-300.
(
link)
(
preprint)
A.Aydin and A.Tarhan. (2014). "Investigating Defect Prediction Models for Iterative Software
Development When Phase Data is not Recorded: Lessons Learned", in proceedings of the 9th
International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE).
(
link)
D.Aslan, A.Tarhan, and O.Demirors. (2014). "How Process Enactment Data Affects Product Defectiveness
Prediction - A Case Study", Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, Studies in
Computational Intelligence, vol. 496, pp.151-166, Springer.
(
link)
B. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
B1. DATA SCIENCE ROADMAP
Kayabay, K., Kılınç, A., Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., & Daim, T. U. (2024). Technology Roadmapping:
Data Science Roadmapping of Networked Organizations' Strategic Planning for Artificial Intelligence.
Future‐Oriented Technology Assessment: A Manager's Guide with Case Applications, 273-300.
Nazlıel, K., Kayabay, K., Gökalp, M. O., Aydın, E. G., Eren, P. E., & Koçyiğit, A. (2024, November).
Developing a Strategic Data Science Roadmap through Trend Analysis and Digital Maturity Assessment.
In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)
(pp. 1-7). IEEE.
(
link)
Nazlıel, K., Kayabay, K., Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., & Eren, E. (2022, April). Data science
technology selection: development of a decision-making approach. In 2022 IEEE Technology and
Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON EUROPE) (pp. 172-178). IEEE.
(
link)
Kayabay, K., Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., Eren, P. E., & Koçyiğit, A. (2022). Data science roadmapping:
An architectural framework for facilitating transformation towards a data-driven organization.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121264.
(
link)
B2. DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
Şener, U., Gökalp, E., & Eren, E. (2022). Dijital Olgunluk İndeksi: Organizasyonlarin Dijital
Dönüşüm Yolculuğunda Verimliliği Artirmak İçin Bir Kantitatif Yöntem. Verimlilik Dergisi, 17-29.
(
link)
Şener, U., Gökalp, E., & Erhan Eren, P. (2022). Intelligent digital transformation strategy
management: Development of a measurement framework. In Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation:
Theory and Applications (pp. 77-93). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
(
link)
Gökalp, E., Gökalp, M. O., Çoban, S., & Eren, P. E. (2019). Dijital dönüşümün etkisinde verimli
istihdam yönetimi: yol haritasi önerisi. Verimlilik Dergisi, 3(3).
(
link)
Gökalp, E., Gökalp, M. O., & Eren, P. E. (2019). Hazır giyim ve konfeksiyon sektöründe endüstri
4.0 devrimi: Akıllı konfeksiyon fabrikası önerisi. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information
Technology, 10(37), 73-96. (
link)
Gökalp, E., Gökalp, M. O., & Eren, P. E. (2018). Industry 4.0 revolution in clothing and apparel
factories: Apparel 4.0. Industry, 4, 169-183.
(
link)
B3. OPEN DATA MANAGEMENT
Çaldağ, M. T., & Gökalp, E. (2023). Understanding barriers affecting the adoption and usage of
open access data in the context of organizations. Data and Information Management, 100049.
(
link)
Çaldağ, M. T., Gökalp, M. O., & Gökalp, E. (2019, November). Open government data: analysing
benefits and challenges. In 2019 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference
(UBMYK) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
(
link)
Çaldağ, M. T., Gökalp, E., & Alkış, N. (2019). Analyzing determinants of open government based
technologies and applications adoption in the context of organizations. In Proceedings of the
International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government
(EEE) (pp. 50-56). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer
Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp).
(
link)
B4. SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Şener, U., Çaldağ, M. T., & Gökalp, E. (2025). Assessing the Maturity of Blockchain-based Supply
Chain Management and Logistics: Comprehensive Examination of the Current Situation. Procedia Computer
Science, 253, 2458-2467.
(
link)
Ozer, E., & Gökalp, E. (2025). Blockchain-Based Medical Supply Chain Management Collaboration:
Exploring the Advantages and Drawbacks. In Blockchain Technology Applications in Knowledge Management
(pp. 215-238). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Çaldağ, M. T., & Gökalp, E. (2023). Organizational adoption of blockchain based medical supply
chain management. In Current and Future Trends on Intelligent Technology Adoption: Volume 1
(pp. 321-343). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
(
link)
Gökalp, E., & Özer, E. (2022). Investigating the Economic Impact of Organizational Adoption of
AI-Enabled Blockchain in 6G-Based Supply Chain Management. In AI and Blockchain Technology in
6G Wireless Network (pp. 181-204). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
(
link)
Gökalp, E., Gökalp, M. O., & Çoban, S. (2022). Blockchain-based supply chain management: understanding
the determinants of adoption in the context of organizations. Information systems management,
39(2), 100-121.
(
link)
Gökalp, E., Coban, S., & Gökalp, M. O. (2019, November). Acceptance of blockchain based supply chain
management system: Research model proposal. In 2019 1st International Informatics and Software
Engineering Conference (UBMYK) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
(
link)
B5. HEALTHCARE
Gökalp, E., Gökalp, M. O., Çoban, S., & Eren, P. E. (2018). Analysing opportunities and challenges
of integrated blockchain technologies in healthcare. Information Systems: Research, Development,
Applications, Education: 11th SIGSAND/PLAIS EuroSymposium 2018, Gdansk, Poland, September 20,
2018, Proceedings 11, 174-183.
(
link)
Çoban, S., Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., Eren, P. E., & Koçyiğit, A. (2018, November). [WiP] Predictive
maintenance in healthcare services with big data technologies. In 2018 IEEE 11th Conference on
Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA) (pp. 93-98). IEEE.
Eren, P. E., & Gökalp, E. (2018). HealthGuide: A personalized mobile patient guidance system. In
Current and Emerging mHealth Technologies: Adoption, Implementation, and Use (pp. 167-187). Cham:
Springer International Publishing.
(
link)
B6. TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE
Şener, U., Gökalp, E., & Eren, P. E. (2016). Cloud-based enterprise information systems: determinants
of adoption in the context of organizations. In Information and Software Technologies: 22nd
International Conference, ICIST 2016, Druskininkai, Lithuania, October 13-15, 2016, Proceedings
22 (pp. 53-66). Springer International Publishing.
(
link)
Gökalp, E. (2014). Determinants of acceptance of mobile games through structural equation modeling.
(
link)
C. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT
C1. PROCESS MINING
Generic
İ.İleri, T.Erdoğan, and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2025). "Privacy for Process Mining: A Systematic
Literature Review", IEEE Access (DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3568889)
(
link).
A.Telli, T.G.Erdogan and A.Kolukısa. (2023). "Detecting Novel Behavior and Process Enhancement
with Multimodal Process Mining," 4th International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference
(IISEC), Ankara, Turkiye, 2023, pp. 1-6, IEEE CPS
(
link).
C.A. Kesici , N. Ozkan, S. Taskesenli , TG Erdogan (2022) Systematic Literature Review of Studies
Comparing Process Mining Tools, International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science
(IJITCS)
B.Ekici, A.Tarhan, and A.Özsoy. (2019). "Data Cleaning for Process Mining with Smart Contract",
in proceedings of The 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK),
IEEE CPS
(
link).
Healthcare
Erdogan, T.G, (2024), A data transformation method for multi-perspective process mining healthcare
applications, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 39.3: 1365-1374
(
link).
M.N.Tiftik, T.Erdogan, and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "A framework for multi-perspective process
mining into a BPMN process model", Journal Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering (SI:
Computational Methods for Process Mining in Healthcare), 19 (11): 11800-11820.
(
link)
T.Erdogan and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2022). "Multi-Perspective Process Mining for Emergency Process",
Health Informatics Journal, 18 (1).
(
link)
T. G. Erdogan (2022), "Data Privacy Issues for Process Mining Application in Big Healthcare Data",
16th International Congress on Quality in Healthcare, Accrediation, and Patient Safety
B.Ekici, T.Erdogan, and A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2021). "BPMN Data Model For Multi-Perspective Process
Mining On Blockchain", Int'l Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (IJSEKE),
32 (2): 317-345.
(
link)
T.Erdogan and A.Tarhan. (2018). "A Goal-Driven Evaluation Method Based on Process Mining for
Healthcare Processes", Applied Sciences, 8(6), pp. 894.
(
link)
T.Erdogan and A.Tarhan. (2018). "Systematic Mapping of Process Mining Studies in Healthcare",
IEEE Access, Vol 6.
(
link)
T. Erdogan and A.Tarhan. (2017) Cerrahi Süreçlerin Keşfi için Süreç Madenciliği Çalışmalarının
Değerlendirilmesi. 2. Uluslararası Sağlıkta Bilişim ve Bilgi Güvenliği Kongresi
T. Erdogan and A.Tarhan. (2017). Sağlık hizmetlerinin tedavi protokollerine uygunluğunu süreç
madenciliği yoluyla tespit eden çalışmaların incelenmesi, 12.Uluslararası Sağlıkta Kalite,
Akreditasyon ve Hasta Güvenliği Kongresi
T. Erdogan and A. Tarhan.(2016) Sağlık Süreçleri Yönetimi için Süreç Madenciliği. 1. Uluslararası
Sağlıkta Bilişim ve Bilgi Güvenliği Kongresi
T. Erdogan and A.Tarhan. (2016). "Process Mining for Healthcare Process Analytics", in proceedings
of IWSM-Mensura, IEEE CPS, pp. 125-130
(
link).
(In Turkish) K.Akeren ve A.Tarhan. (2016). “Hastalıkların Tedavi Sürecinin Protokollere Uygunluğunun
Analizi: Süreç Madenciliğine Yönelik Araç Geliştirme”, X. Ulusal Yazılım Mühendisliği Sempozyumu,
Çanakkale (CEUR Proceedings, sf. 207-218)
(
link).
Software Development
S. Taskesenli, N. Ozkan, T.G. Erdogan (2022) Identifying Possible Improvements of Software Development
Lifecycle Process of a Bank by Using Process Mining, International Journal of Software Engineering
and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1–28, DOI: 10.1142/S0218194022400010
(
link)
T.G.Erdoğan, A.Tarhan, and N.A.Karagoz. (2013). “An Integrated Infrastructure Using Process mining
Techniques for Software Process Verification”,
(
Uncovering
Essential Software Artifacts through Business Process Archaeology), Idea Group Inc..
(In Turkish) T.Gurgen and A.Tarhan. (2012) “Yazılım Süreç Doğrulama İçin Bütünleşik Bir Altyapı”,
sf. 169-176, VI.Ulusal Yazılım Mühendisliği Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara.
(In Turkish) T.Gürgen ve A.Tarhan. (2011). “Süreç Madenciliğinin Yazılım Süreç Doğrulama İçin
Kullanımı”, V. Ulusal Yazılım Mühendisliği Sempozyumu (UYMS) Bildiriler Kitabı, sf. 234-237, Ankara.
(
link)
C2. PROCESS MODELING
Process Modeling & Requirements Elicitation
A.Tarhan, Ç.Gencel, and O.Demirörs. (2007). “Pre-Contract Challenges: Two Large System Acquisition
Experiences”, Chapter 4, pp.51-73,
(
Enterprise
Architecture and Integration), (ISBN: 978-1-59140-887-1), IGI Global, Information Science
Reference, Hershey-NY.
O.Demirörs, Ç.Gencel, and A.Tarhan. (2003). “Utilizing Business Process Models for Requirements
Elicitation: A Large System Acquisition Experience”, in Proceedings of the 29th Euromicro Conference,
pp. 409-412. (
link)
C3. PROCESS MATURITY
Generic
A.Tarhan, O.Turetken, and H.A.Reijers. (2016). "Business Process Maturity Models: A Systematic
Literature Review", Information & Software Technology, vol.75, pp. 122-134
(
author version)
(
link).
A.Tarhan and O.Turetken (2016). "Critical Success Factors of Business Process Management:
Investigating the Coverage of Business Process (Management) Maturity Models", Technical Report,
Zenodo. (
link)
A.Tarhan, O.Turetken, and H.A.Reijers. (2015) "Do Mature Business Processes Lead To Improved
Performance? - A Review of the Empirical Evidence", in proceedings of European Conference on
Information Systems (ECIS), AIS Electronic Library.
(
link)
Data Science
Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., Gökalp, S., & Koçyiğit, A. (2023). The development of data analytics
maturity assessment framework: DAMAF. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 35(8), e2415.
(
link)
Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., Kayabay, K., Koçyiğit, A., & Eren, P. E. (2022). The development of
the data science capability maturity model: a survey-based research. Online Information Review,
46(3), 547-567. (
link)
Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., Kayabay, K., Koçyiğit, A., & Eren, P. E. (2021). Data-driven manufacturing:
An assessment model for data science maturity. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60, 527-546.
(
link)
Digital Transformation
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2022). Digital transformation maturity assessment: development of the
digital transformation capability maturity model. International Journal of Production Research,
60(20), 6282-6302. (
link)
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2021). Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the
assessment of industrial manufacturers. Computers in Industry, 132, 103522.
(
link)
Şener, U., Gökalp, E., & Eren, P. E. (2018). Towards a maturity model for industry 4.0: A systematic
literature review and a model proposal. Industry, 4, 291-303.
Energy / Demand Response
F.İlisulu, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan, and K.Kavak. (2021). "Demand Response Process Assessment Model:
Development and Case Study Assessment", Computers: Standards and Interfaces, Vol. 82, 103609
(
link).
F.İlisulu, A.K.Tarhan, and K.Kavak. (2020). "Akıllı Şebeke Olgunluk Modeli ve Uygulamaları (EN.
Smart Grid Maturity Model and Applications"), Ulusalararası Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, Vol.
13, Issue 2, pp. 123-136.
(
link)
Healthcare
Ayça Kolukısa-Tarhan, V.Garousi, O.Turetken, M.Söylemez, and S.Garossi. (2020) "Maturity assessment
and maturity models in healthcare: A multivocal literature review", Digital Health, Vol 6, pp. 1-20.
(
link).
M.Söylemez and A.Tarhan. (2017). "A Review and Comparison of Maturity/Capability Frameworks for
Healthcare Process Assessment and Improvement", Software Quality Professional, 19 (2), ASQ.
(
link).
M.Söylemez and A.Tarhan. (2016). "The Use of Maturity/Capability Frameworks for Healthcare Process
Assessment and Improvement", in proceedings of The 16th International SPICE Conference, Springer
CCIS (Communications in Computer and Information Science), vol. 609, pp. 31-42.
(
link)
A.Tarhan, O. Turetken, and F.J.H.M. van den Biggelaar. (2015). "Assessing Healthcare Process
Maturity: Challenges Of Using A Business Process Maturity Model", in proceedings of Process-oriented
approach for patient-centered care delivery (ProCare) Workshop organized within Pervasive Health
Conference. (
link)
Open Data
Çaldağ, M. T., & Gökalp, E. (2022). The maturity of open government data maturity: a multivocal
literature review. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 74(6), 1007-1030.
(
link)
Software Development
Gökalp, E., Çalişkanbaş, B., & Koçyiğit, A. (2024). A reference model for software product line
capability assessment. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 36(4), e2567.
(
link)
Özkurt, A., Gökalp, E., & Ipek, A. H. (2024). A Software Test Maturity Model Customized for
Aerospace Industries: A Systematic Literature Review. In European Conference on Software Process
Improvement (pp. 374-389). Springer, Cham.
(
link)
G.Güngör, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2023). "A Maturity Model Guidance Approach for Integration Testing
of Avionics Software", 32nd International Workshop on Software Measurement (IWSM) and the 17th
International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (MENSURA), Rome, Italy
(CEUR Proceedings, Vol. 3543)
(
link).
C4. PROCESS ASSESSMENT
Generic
A.Tarhan, O.Turetken, and F.İlisulu. (2015). "Business Process Maturity Assessment: State of the
Art and Key Characteristics", in proceedings of The 41th Euromicro Conference on Software
Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 430-437, IEEE CPS.
(
link)
Data Science
Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., Kayabay, K., Gökalp, S., Koçyiğit, A., & Eren, P. E. (2022). A process
assessment model for big data analytics. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 80, 103585.
(
link)
Gökalp, M. O., Kayabay, K., Gökalp, E., Koçyiğit, A., & Eren, P. E. (2021). Assessment of process
capabilities in transition to a data‐driven organisation: A multidisciplinary approach. Iet Software,
15(6), 376-390. (
link)
Gökalp, M. O., Kayabay, K., Gökalp, E., Koçyiğit, A., & Eren, P. E. (2020). Towards a model based
process assessment for data analytics: an exploratory case study. In Systems, Software and Services
Process Improvement: 27th European Conference, EuroSPI 2020, Düsseldorf, Germany, September 9–11,
2020, Proceedings 27 (pp. 617-628). Springer International Publishing.
Digital Trasformation
Gökalp, E. (2022). A Process Assessment Model for Human Resource Skill Development Enabling Digital
Transformation. Evolving Software Processes: Trends and Future Directions, 271-281.
Energy / Demand Response
F.İlisulu, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan, and K.Kavak. (2021). "Demand Response Process Assessment Model:
Development and Case Study Assessment", Computers: Standards and Interfaces, Vol. 82, 103609
(
link).
Open Data
Çaldağ, M. T., & Gökalp, E. (2022). Developing a reference model for open data capability maturity
assessment. Evolving Software Processes: Trends and Future Directions, 135-150.
(
link)
Public
Gökalp, E., Demirörs, O., & Eren, P. E. (2020). Public personnel management process capability
assessment. Public Personnel Management, 49(1), 111-140.
Gökalp, E., & Demirörs, O. (2017). Model based process assessment for public financial and physical
resource management processes. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 54, 186-193.
Gökalp, E., & Demirörs, O. (2016). Towards a process capability assessment model for government
domain. In Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination: 16th International Conference,
SPICE 2016, Dublin, Ireland, June 9-10, 2016, Proceedings 16 (pp. 210-224). Springer International
Publishing.
Gökalp, E., & Demirörs, O. (2014). Government process capability model: an exploratory case study.
In International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (pp. 94-105).
Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Software Development
D.Savaş, E.Gokalp, A.Kolukısa-Tarhan. (2021). "Capability Assessment of Software Product Line
Processes in Defense Industry", in proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Computer
Science and Engineering (UBMK), IEEE CPS
(
link).
A.Tarhan and G.Giray. (2017). "On the Use of Ontologies in Software Process Assessment: A Systematic
Literature Review", in proceedings of Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE),
ACM, pp. 2-11. (
link)
S.Gazel, E.A.Sezer, and A.Tarhan. (2012). “An Ontology Based Infrastructure To Support CMMI-Based
Software Process Assessment”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol 25, no 1, sf.155-164.
(
link)
A.Tarhan and O.Demirörs. (2011). “Investigating the Effect of Variations in Test Development Process:
A Case from a Safety-Critical System”, Software Quality Journal, cilt 19, sayı 4, sf. 615-642.
(
link)